You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘black’ tag.





Sarah Palin didn’t call for a boycott of Black Santa because he was described as white in the Bible.  She didn’t get coal from the Black Santa.  She hasn’t become friends with Shailey Tripp.  She hasn’t produced a birth certificate for Trig.    She hasn’t returned Bristol’s ring.  She hasn’t made any more blueberry pie,


any nobody knows what happened to the Palin Thanksgiving?!


(Did Trig recover from the Thanksgiving-choke-hold?)

Sarah hasn’t been seen doing any more rock running,






or brawling.


Perhaps nobody cares if she isn’t doing these things, but we are certain that Palin has her “panties in a wad”

because Trump hasn’t found a position for her in his cabinet yet.


I know she’s be mentioned for Energy Secretary, Interior Secretary, and now she’s even gone so far as to tell the Trump team that she want’s the position as Secretary of Veterans affairs.  Maybe she could arrange to sit on Santa’s lap and tell him about her wish too!


The fact that Sarah Palin is a bigot, ignorant, or destructive to women is indisputable.  For six years this blog has been dedicated to the documentation of her ignorance, bigotry and the multitude of things she has said and done that were contrary to the best interest of women.  From her requirement of rape victims to pay for their rape exam kits, to her attire, it is clear that she works to reinforce the image of herself a one hot, ignorant woman.

In a single Facebook post Sarah, has demonstrated her bigotry, ignorance, and lack of respect for educated professional women.  In her Oct. 5th post “Conservatives Need Not Apply” Palin attacks the Smithsonian in the creation of the new “African American museum.”
Instead of taking this opportunity to pretend that she cares about Black Lives, Palin has gone on the offensive.  Instead of mentioning the importance of the recognition that Black Lives Matter, Palin is critical of the museum for who was not included in the people recognized by the museum.  Here is a list of just a few of the items that museum has accumulated to document the tortured history and accomplishments of African Americans in our country:
Yet Palin doesn’t mention any of these.  Instead she complains that Clarence Thomas was not included, and the it was the result of liberals who ignore the fact that there are conservative Blacks.  Palin didn’t mention that there was no recognition of Anita Hill, the African American woman who testified about the fact that Clarence Thomas had sexually harassed her.  Palin also failed to complain that the museum does not mention Herman Cain or Bill Cosby.
The offensive nature of this post is overwhelming.  Palin’s ignorance of the real issues is astonishing!

 (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, Pool)

(AP Photo/Susan Walsh, Pool)

The early reports regarding the National Museum of African American History  are that it is fantastic.  Justice Clarence Thomas is mentioned in the museum, but so is Anita Hill.  The museum highlights Anita Hill’s accusations against Thomas.  The new Smithsonian, which opened in September, gives Hill pride of place in an exhibit on blacks in the 1990s. The exhibit features testimonies trumpeting her courage and the surge of women’s activism that ensued, while making only peripheral reference to the nation’s second black Supreme Court justice.”

By taking sides with Thomas, and suggesting that he should have been lauded as the first Black Justice to the Supreme Court, Sarah Palin shows her ignorance of the underlying controversy, and her commitment to disparage Blacks in America.  If Thomas was guilty of sexually harassing Anita Hill, then his prominence in the museum would be analogous to a Bill Cosby exhibit and a Herman Cain exhibit.  Each could have a prominent picture of each famous Black man, and then pictures of each of the women they sexually harassed and/or raped.

Consider what we now know about the Thomas/Hill scandal.

  1.   Hill is an attorney and serves at Brandeis University as a Professor of Social Policy, Law, and Women’t Studies.
  2.   She worked with Thomas at the US Department of Education and the Equal Employment Commission.
  3.   Thomas’ character was a primary consideration for his appointment as he had served for slightly more than one year as a judge before the appointment.
  4.   It was a private interview of Anita Hill by the FBI that was leaked to the press which lead to HIll’s testimony.
  5. Hill was called to testify publicly in interrogation before Congress.  Thus it was not an attempt by Anita Hill to thwart confirmation.
  6. According to Hill, during her two years of employment as Thomas’s assistant, Thomas spoke about…such matters as women having sex with animals and films showing group sex or rape scenes,” she said, adding that on several occasions Thomas graphically described “his own sexual prowess” and the details of his anatomy.[5] Hill also recounted an instance in which Thomas examined a can of Coke on his desk and asked, “Who has put pubic hair on my Coke?”[5] During court session, Republican Senator Orrin Hatch implied that “Hill was working in tandem with “slick lawyers” and interest groups bent on destroying Thomas’ chances to join the court”.  John Doggett an acquaintance of both Hill and Clarence called her charge “completely unfounded” and added when she chastised him not being on her side that he felt “she was somewhat unstable” and suspects histrionic personality disorder for herattention seeking.[15]
  7. Four female witnesses waited outside the hearings to support Hill’s credibility, but they were not called,[13][16] due to what the Los Angeles Times described as a private, compromise deal between Republicans and the Senate Judiciary CommitteeChair, Democrat Joe Biden.[17] According to Time magazine, one of the witnesses, Angela Wright, may not have been considered credible on the issue of sexual harassment because she had been fired from the EEOC by Thomas.[16]
  8. Hill agreed to take a polygraph test. The results supported the veracity of her statements;[18] Thomas declined the test.
  9.  After extensive debate, the United States Senate confirmed Thomas to the Supreme Court by a vote of 52–48, the narrowest margin since the 19th century.[16][21][dead link]
  10. Hill’s grandparents were born into slavery.[6]
  11. It was Joe Biden who refused to call witnesses who would’ve supported Hill’s claims.  Almost twenty years later, America still fails victims of sexual harassment and abuse.
  12. Justice Thomas had an obsessive interest in pornography. 
  13. The author of a book about the scandal, has now admitted he lied.


To mark the opening of the museum to the public, the 99-year-old daughter of a former slave, Ruth Bonners, and her seven-year-old granddaughter joined the president and first lady Michelle Obama to ring the Freedom Bell, which is believed to be from the first black baptist church in the US, founded in 1776.



We still live in a country with a legal system that is, at times, ill-equipped to handle the aftermath of sexual harassment and violence, and an atmosphere in which victims are still reticent to speak up, because they know the costs are often far greater than the rewardsHill was also torn apart by elements of the press and general public. Pundit David Brock infamously described Hill as “a little bit nutty and a little slutty.” And as Hill told the NYTimes in October 1991, she faced consistent harassment as a result of her testimony.  Given the recent scandals surrounding Bill Cosby and Hermain Cain it isn’t surprising that nobody believed Anita Hill at the time.  When it comes to the treatment of women in 2016, our “hang-ups” are still many. But if Hill’s legacy, and its retelling in “Confirmation” can drive one thing home, it’s that there is power in speaking up.

Hopefully that power is equally important to shine a light on the malicious and destructive nature of all things Palin.  She is a destructive force for women.  Both professional educated women, and dedicated mothers wish she would go away.  Sarah Palin represents all that is destructive for women.


It’s no secret that Sarah Palin is a racist.   Her recent Facebook Post simply confirms her bigotry.  For two days we have been waiting for Sarah Palin to provide her thoughts…or ramblings…on the debate performances of Donald and Hillary.  In between two other posts, Sarah offered a comment on the debate.  She said:

* Why’d the debate not focus on HILLARY originating the Obama Birther issue? (Which has been shown to be false.)

* Why no questions on illegal immigration?
* Why no focus on democrats not batting an eye at our $200 trillion true debt full of unfunded future liabilities?
* Why no question on the crony capitalism that defines the Clinton Foundation and her stint as Sec. of State?
* Why do reformers have to wait until the next debate to see Trump “take no prisoners?”

Then Sarah linked to a video of Diamond and Silk, two Black women, who are outspoken Black women advocates of Trump for President.


I wondered by Palin would focus attention on these two women.  They did not appear to be well spoken, have any expert credentials, and impressed me as examples of women who would promote the stereotype of ignorant Blacks.  These are the answers I found:

  1.  During the short time Sarah Palin pretended to be a news host on “On Point with Sarah Palin” these Black sisters gave her an interview.


2.  During the segment with Palin, Diamond and Silk demonstrated their ignorance by using words that are not found in the dictionary.  Diamond referred to media “biasness.”  Diamond used incorrect verb tenses including her remark that “Megyn Kelly asking questions that does not (sic) make sense, …”

3.  They admitted that before the 2016 race their only involvement in politics was to vote.

4.  Palin and the women were critical of Megyn Kelly’s questions of Trump regarding women’s issues because they were “things on the periphery, and things that have nothing to do with the Presidential race. ”

Reason they support Trump is that he wants to make America Great Again, wants to secure the border, and make America safe.

If Trump weren’t running, Palin asked,  what would you be putting energy into?  The answer was “media biasness.”


Diamond and Silk have enjoyed significant national attention as a result of their promotion of Trump.


Diamond and Silk have a history of taking stands on political issues that demonstrate a lack of understanding  of the issues.  They criticized Texas police officer Brian Encinia for his actions in arresting activist Sandra Bland. Bland was found dead three days after the encounter inside a jail cell. Authorities have said that Bland killed herself.

“Even though we know all lives matter, in this case, this black life mattered,” Hardaway said. “And this white man ain’t gonna get to do that to this black girl.”


They seem to be focused on illegal immigrants:


They also made this video about Hillary’s remarks on the “Basket of Deplorables”:


The amazing this is that Diamond and Silk seem to be unaware of Trump’s history of racism.  Before a live audience and an estimated 100 million TV viewers, Trump struggled to explain why a real-estate company he managed settled a Justice Department racial discrimination suit. He called for a law-and-order crackdown as a remedy for racial conflict, including a stop-and-frisk policy the courts found unconstitutional and discriminatory. He also continued to describe black and Hispanic communities as urban hellscapes where armed gangs “roam the streets,” even though civic leaders say the description is offensive and incorrect.

In perhaps the biggest contradiction to his outreach, Trump couldn’t come up with a plausible or coherent explanation for why he suddenly dropped a five-year quest, launched at his own expense, to prove President Barack Obama – the nation’s first black commander-in-chief, and a source of pride among African Americans – was not born in the United States.

A poll released by ABC News and the Washington Post found that 93 percent of black voters preferred Clinton. Just 3 percent liked Trump, 2 percent backed Libertarian Gary Johnson and 4 percent supported Green Party nominee Jill Stein.

Several polls have shown that only 1% to 2% of African Americans plan to vote for Trump, an all-time low even for a Republican presidential candidate. In the recent NBC/Wall Street Journal poll, only 7% say they will support him. Blacks recognize Trump’s bigotry and, by extension, the bigotry of the Republican Party. A Suffolk University poll found that an astonishing 87% of African Americans believe that Trump is a racist. His latest call for a national “stop and frisk” policy only solidifies that view.
The Black news host who have interviewed these sisters artfully point out their lack of understanding of the issues:

Roland Martin couldn’t get a straight answer about any understanding about how Trump planned to bring jobs back? They were unaware that Trump had shipped jobs overseas to China.

These sisters have turned their advocacy for Trump into a financial boon-doggle.  They have made more than 125 videos.  They refuse to tell what Trump said to them privately.  These women have been described as  ghetto fabulous, in your face, over the top, reality television,  ignorant, disgusting, dumb ghetto fabulous morons.
When asked what did before Trump, they said: “now we have to get all personal.”  They later called themselves  entrepreneurs, but refused to be more specific.  They remarked that it was “None of your business” to the reporter questioning them.  Financial benefits from promotions of trump.  It is clear that Diamond and Silk, like their parents who were  television-evangalists selling herbal pills on television, have become celebrities, and made substantial money off their advocacy for Trump.  Even Trump has introduced them as “very rich.”

Only Sarah Palin could disparage Blacks in America while pretending to respect them.

Evolution of the Feminine Mystique

Just Say NO to BS

The Ignorance of Sarah Palin

Rebuttal to the Rogue


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 4,301 other followers

Share This Blog