Trump, America’s New Dictator, Threatens Stephen Colbert

Since long before the election of Donald Trump, Stephen Colbert has given America the gift of humor to relieve stress caused by Trump.

Since the election of Trump, Stephen Colbert has devoted a section of almost every show to humor at Trump’s expense.

The Federal Communications Commission has announced that it is going to investigate the possibility that a recent Colbert monologue went too far.  This is the monologue.

As indicated, the show that aired bleeped out the word “cock”.  We know what was bleeped out because articles on line reported the actual words.  Rolling Stone reported:

On Monday’s Late Show, Colbert quipped that “the only thing [Trump’s] mouth is good for is being Vladimir Putin’s cock holster.”

FCC chairman Ajit Pai said that his agency will be looking into complaints made against Stephen Colbert for what some labeled a homophobic joke about President Donald Trump.

“I have had a chance to see the clip now and so, as we get complaints — and we’ve gotten a number of them — we are going to take the facts that we find and we are going to apply the law as it’s been set out by the Supreme Court and other courts and we’ll take the appropriate action.”

Pai’s comments on Colbert are surprising as “The Late Show” airs outside the FCC’s long-established “safe harbor” time frame of 6 am to 10 pm in which the commission has the authority to police allegations of indecent and obscene material on the airwaves. They would also seem to clash with Pai’s vow to maintain a lighter regulatory environment for media overall.

So the question that everyone in America is asking, is why would Pai announce an investigation?  Did Trump, directly or indirectly, order this investigation?  Will the “investigation” have the desired effect of moderating Colbert’s derogatory remarks about Trump?

Image result for trump colbert

There is no question that Colbert’s remarks fail to meet the criterion of “obscene” as set forth in Title 18 of the United States Code, Section 1464, which prohibits the utterance of any obscene, indecent or profane language by means of radio communication. Consistent with a subsequent statute and court case, the Commission’s rules prohibit the broadcast of indecent material during the period of 6 a.m. and 10 p.m. FCC decisions also prohibit the broadcast of profane material between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m. Civil enforcement of these requirements rests with the FCC, and is an important part of the FCC’s overall responsibilities. At the same time, the FCC must be mindful of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and Section 326 of the Communications Act, which prohibit the FCC from censoring program material, or interfering with broadcasters’ free speech rights.

Obscene speech is not protected by the First Amendment and broadcasters are prohibited, by statute and regulation, from airing obscene programming at any time. According to the U.S. Supreme Court, to be obscene, material must meet a three-prong test: (1) an average person, applying contemporary community standards, must find that the material, as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest (i.e., material having a tendency to excite lustful thoughts); (2) the material must depict or describe, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by applicable law; and (3) the material, taken as a whole, must lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. The Supreme Court has indicated that this test is designed to cover hard-core pornography.  It seems to me that any fair minded individual would not consider Colbert’s remarks as “hard-core pornography.”  So who is responsible for this announced investigation and on what basis would the FCC even consider such an investigation?  If Trump were a dictator he would be able to order an investigation and demand the resignation of Colbert.

Image result for trump dictator

Trump has been frequently compared to dictators.  As early as March of 2016 articles appeared to warn of the risk of a Trump dictatorship.  The express concern was that Trump might attempt to intimidate any who would oppose him.  It appears that those fears have materialized.  In February of 2016 it was reported that “Trump Wants A Ruthless America,” in an article identifying Trump as the most dangerous man in the world:

“Believe me, I’ll change things. And again, we’re going to be so respected. I don’t want to use the word ‘feared,'” he told the audience. But that is precisely what Trump wants: to be feared. His bid for the White House, long ridiculed, is a fight for a ruthless, brutal America. Behind his campaign slogan “Make America great again!” is the vision of a country that no longer cares about international treaties, ethnic minorities or established standards of decency.”

Consider these articles:

The starkest difference between dictatorships and democracies is that democracies are ruled by laws, and dictatorships are ruled by dictators.  The “rule of law,” as it’s often referred to, stands for laws that emerge from a process responsive to the majority, that are consistently applied, and are applicable to everyone regardless of their position or power.  Donald Trump doesn’t seem to understand this.  The best aesthetic descriptor of Trump’s look, I’d argue, is dictator style.”

“When Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah el-Sisi met with U.S. President Donald Trump in Washington on Monday, I couldn’t help thinking about how Trump’s presidency increasingly resembles a Middle East autocracy.”

Image result for trump dictator

“U.S. president Donald Trump intends to be a dictator. By this I mean that he wishes to individually dictate law and individually control the levers of the state through a mixture of legal and extralegal mechanisms with no effective external restraint. The actions he is taking are all in pursuit of this goal, and he is already well on his way.”

The U.S. Constitution was created in such  a way to protect America by a separation of powers, checks and balances and federalism precisely to avoid concentrated power. Their goal was to stop authoritarians like Donald Trump.  If you want proof that Trump is an authoritarian remember that an “authoritarian” is a person who governs by valuing order and control over personal freedom and seeks to concentrate power in the hands of a single “strongman.”  Viewed through the lens of authoritarianism, Trump’s approach to governing is logical and coherent.  For example, an authoritarian wouldn’t follow the normal process in a constitutional democracy for disputing a judicial decision he dislikes – which is to appeal it to a higher court.  An authoritarian would instead assail judges who rule against him, as Trump has done repeatedly. He’d also threaten to hobble the offending courts, as Trump did in urging that the 9th Circuit be broken up.

Likewise, an authoritarian has no patience for normal legislative rules – designed, as they are in a democracy, to create opportunities for deliberation.  Which is why Trump told Mitch McConnell to use the “nuclear option” against the time-honored Senate filibuster, in order to confirm Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court.


Trump called House and Senate rules “archaic” and urged they be abandoned. “We don’t have a lot of closers in politics, and I understand why. It’s a very rough system. It’s an archaic system,” he said.

Through the eyes of an authoritarian, rules that block what the authoritarian wants to do are always “bad for the country,” as Trump said of them.

Trump would like to get rid of the filibuster altogether. “The filibuster concept is not a good concept to start off with.

An authoritarian also seeks to intimidate the press, in order to avoid criticism and consolidate his power.   Trump still doesn’t miss an opportunity to assail the media for publishing “fake news.” His chief of staff has revived Trump’s campaign proposal to widen libel laws so that he can sue the press for stories he doesn’t like.

Authoritarians do not tolerate other levels of government with their own powers and responsibilities. Which is why Trump wants to force states and cities to report on unauthorized immigrants, even though this violates the principle of federalism enshrined in the 10th Amendment.

Finally, authoritarians promote other authoritarians, in an effort to normalize authoritarian rule.

Trump invited President Rodrigo Duterte of the Philippines to visit the White House.  Duterte is an authoritarian leader accused of ordering extra-judicial killings of thousands of people suspected of using or selling narcotics as well as others who may have had no involvement with drugs. He has referred to former President Barack Obama as a “son of a whore.”  And he has declared open season on suspected terrorists, saying that if he were presented with a suspected terrorist, “give me salt and vinegar and I’ll eat his liver.”

Two weeks ago, Trump phoned to congratulate President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey for his victory in a referendum filled with voting irregularities that expanded Erdogan’s powers and has put Turkey on the road to dictatorship.

Trump has praised President Xi Jinping of China, the most authoritarian leader China has had since Mao Zedong.

Trump also hosted at the White House Egyptian president Abdel Fattah el Sisi, who had not been granted an invitation to the White House since seizing power in a military coup almost four years ago.

And don’t forget Trump’s vow during the presidential campaign to pursue a warmer relationship with President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia. (The effort has faltered in light of possible links between the Trump campaign and Russian officials.)

Image result for trump dictator

Donald Trump’s authoritarianism is a consistent and coherent philosophy of governing. But it’s not America’s.  






12 thoughts on “Trump, America’s New Dictator, Threatens Stephen Colbert

Add yours

  1. Trump is despicable. He acts like a dictator, taking away our freedom of speech. He must be removed asap if we are to retain any freedom in this country.


    1. I am not posting this to be offensive or contrary; just to inform for something we should all realize & think about.
      IMO; Getting Rid of Trump is about The Worst thing Anti-Trumpers can do or plan; as the next 15 of 17 eligible in the current Presidential Line of Succession would probably be even worse for our country;
      Heavy Duty Far Right Wing Tea Partier Types…
      So; I am personally recommending that we:
      A. Get Busy & Involved w/all of the upcoming 2018 Elections to knock out Republicans from seats they hold at Local, County, State & Federal levels to get Democrats, Greens, Independents, or Libertarians into these offices currently held Republican positions; and…
      B. Suck it up; put up with Trump until Jan. 2021; until we accomplish the above Goal to eradicate the Republican Majorities across the nation until the Nov. 2020 elections.

      NOT ACCEPTABLE Trump Replacements #1 – 15:
      No. Office Current officer

      1 Vice President Mike Pence (R)
      2 Speaker of the House of Representatives Paul Ryan (R)
      3 President pro tempore of the Senate Orrin Hatch (R)
      4 Secretary of State Rex Tillerson (R)
      5 Secretary of the Treasury Steven Mnuchin (R)
      6 Secretary of Defense James Mattis (I)
      7 Attorney General Jeff Sessions (R)
      8 Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke (R)
      9 Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue (R)
      10 Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross (R)
      11 Secretary of Labor Alex Acosta (R)
      12 Secretary of Health and Human Services Tom Price (R)
      13 Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Ben Carson (R)

      –* Secretary of Transportation Elaine Chao (R)[** Not a natural-born citizen (acquired U.S. citizenship by naturalization) and thus ineligible for the Presidency.]

      14 Secretary of Energy Rick Perry (R)
      15 Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos (R)

      Possible ACCEPTABLE Trump Replacements # 16 & 17:
      16 Secretary of Veterans Affairs David Shulkin (I)
      17 Secretary of Homeland Security John F. Kelly (I)

      Source: Wiki: United States Presidential Line of Succession


  2. Oh No Malia he knows the difference. And his job is to save his ass and his money bags. Every word from his nasty dirty holster. Every action he takes has reason and purpose to save his empire from putin. The entire lying bunch of crooks from trump down to those he hires from other countries to clean his toilets are working and motivated by trump debt.


  3. Mr. Trump better suck it up & get used to it; this is what he; and any politician; signs up for when they put themselves out there at the mercy of the public. He is simply not used to anybody ever criticizing him; it’s the ‘spoiled, rich kid/bully who buys &/or threatens people because he can’ instead of truly forming bonds with them syndrome.


  4. Kind of unrelated – but was just wondering if anyone knew if Bristol quit Dr. Jack Me Off, or if she’s just on sabbatical while in Texas with her murderous one-note husband and out-of-wedlock children.


  5. The man went from being his own boss to public servant/protector/representative. he can stop trying to be the boss of everything he’s not a god he’s acting like some spoiled man child. picking on the poor and disabled must’ve been instinct as a mega slumlord for him to write such a horrible budget proposal. He’s stealing from the till And we the people need to fire him.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: