Does anyone care if Bristol Palin has children out of wedlock? Does anyone care if Sarah Palin was pregnant before she married Todd?
Does anyone care that Track got two different girls pregnant before marrying them?
The answer is that nobody would care, except that the Palins continue to spawn children out of wedlock, while pretending to be advocates of traditional marriage. Bristol Palin has taken it a step too far. If you thought her commercial about abstinence was a joke, you wouldn’t be the first person.
If you thought her declaration on national television that she would remain abstinent after giving birth to Tripp, a child conceived out of wedlock, was laughable, you wouldn’t be alone.
If you were offended that the Born-again-virgin had a “trial marriage’ with Gino, by living with him, you wouldn’t be alone.
However the latest from Bristol has shocked readers from across the country. She has taken her commitment to abstinence before marriage a step too far. Her quote from Samaritan’s Purse on her blog defies logic and reason. It is a statement that is so absurd that some might think that a late-night comedian made it up. It is not a joke! Bristol really quoted from the Samaritan’s Purse website as follows:
“The family spent several hours visiting and conversing with 10 military couples who are spending this week in southwestern Alaska where they are learning about God’s principles for a healthy, biblical marriage—especially on dealing with the stress that comes from combat injuries and lengthy overseas deployments.”
Yes, she really quoted a reference to “biblical marriage.” What is “biblical marriage?” You guessed right. It is the recognition of the importance of a Christian marriage ceremony, performed between a heterosexual couple, of the same race, before engaging in sexual intercourse. Here are quotes about a “biblical marriage.”
“Human reproduction comes through intimate sexual union designed only for the marriage relationship. Cohabitation abuses the procreative nature of the marriage relationship….. The procreative injunction obviously precludes homosexual “marriages.”
Bristol is married to Dakota Meyer. Dakota appears to be of the same race as Bristol, and he appears to be heterosexual. However 2 out of 3 doesn’t qualify theirs as a “biblical marriage.” The fact that Bristol had intercourse with multiple men before her marriage to Dakota would seem to disqualify hers as a “biblical marriage.” Even Mary Magdalene was repentant. Bristol seems to be proud to have a “biblical marriage” when she clearly does not.