You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘Wasilla’ tag.

It doesn’t take an expert to realize that the national debt is the single most challenging problem facing our country at this time in history.  During the election of 2008 McCain “suspended” his campaign to focus on the economy.  Gas was $4.00 per gallon; the rate of unemployment was frightening; Wall Street was a disaster; banks were in crisis; the auto industry was on the verge of bankruptcy; and health care in the United States was more expensive than in virtually any other country in the world.  In 2008, the combination of George W. Bush, Sarah Palin, and the economy, were a fatal combination for the Republican Party.  The national debt has now increased.  If we are to have a chance of saving the country, it is incumbent upon each of us to understand how we got here, and took look for committed leaders to solve our economic challenges.

Students of history know that certain facts are incontrovertible:

1.  Our nation began its existence in debt as a result of the Revolutionary War.

2.  Before Jackson left office he was successful in reducing the national debt to $18,000.

3.  The national debt has increased as a result of every major war.  The national debt has virtually never been reduced since Jackson.

4.  Since 1946, Democratic presidents increased the national debt by an average of 3.2% per year.

5.  Since 1946 Republican presidents have increased the national debt by an average of 9.2% per year.

6.  Republican presidents, Reagan, Bush, and Bush II raised the debt an average of 10.8% per year.  That means that for every dollar a Democratic President raised the national debt in the last 30 years, Republican presidents have raised the debt by $2.52.

7.  Since 1961 the debt of the United States has never been reduced.

8.  The United States is borrowing more money than all other nations on Earth combined.

9.  The national debt has grown and continues to grow at an unsustainable rate.

10.  In the past 60 years, when the Republicans were in control of the presidency and both Houses of Congress, neither debt nor government spending was reduced.  Both Democrats and Republicans are responsible for the national debt.  “We the people” have been the beneficiaries of this spending.

11.  For at least 10 years, the cost of Social Security and Medicare was known to be unsustainable.

12.  For the 2010 budget the following costs are incontrovertible:

a. 20% ($715 billion) dedicated to defense and national security spending

b. 20% ($708 billion) dedicated to social security

c. 21% ($753 billion) dedicated to Medicare, Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program

13.  Studies have shown that 5% of Medicare patients who die each year account for 30% of Medicare’s costs, with 75% of the expenses of the last year of life occurring in the month before death.  This translates into roughly $226 billion which represents dollars spent during the last year of life for medical treatment of people on Medicare.  Of that $226 billion dollars, $169 billion is spent in the month before death.

14.  The national debt as of April 20, 2010 was 12.8 trillion dollars.

15.  As of April 1st 2010, the federal government spent $202 Billion on interest payments alone.

Given this historical analysis, it seems there is little about which informed people might argue.

  1. The debt of the United States is unsustainable.
  2. The solution to the economic woes of our country will require the cooperation of the President and both Houses of Congress, and elected officials, regardless of their political party, who are committed to finding solutions to economic challenges facing the country, instead of increasing their own personal wealth.
  3. Increasing military spending, increasing entitlements, and cutting taxes are inconsistent with reducing the national debt.

Sarah Palin has branded herself as a “fiscal conservative”.  How many times have we heard Ex-Governor Palin giving a speech about cutting taxes, increasing military spending, and concurrently reducing the national debt, without offering any explanation about how anyone could possibly accomplish those conflicting goals?  Of course the minor details of implementing such an economic philosophy are not her concern since she has divorced herself from any responsibility for governance of any portion of the country.  Isn’t it ironic that people pay large sums of money to hear her talk about reducing the national debt, while the debt increases each day along with Palin’s bank account?  At the end of the speech the audience lacks any idea about how these conflicting goals could possibly be achieved, but they are more adamant than ever that the government should be able to accomplish the goal, because Sarah said it was so.  Sarah Palin has become a millionaire, while our country sinks further in debt.  Who would disagree with a pretty lady when she says that we should lower taxes, protect our country from foreign enemies, and balance the budget?  Divine intervention is the only answer that Palin offers to accomplish her goals.  She is right about that.  She has also figured out how to suggest a solution to the financial crisis that would not negatively impact anyone.  If God could save us, then we don’t have to make any hard choices.  A miracle is the only solution to our national debt if we are unwilling to make some hard choices.  The problem is that if divine intervention was the answer, it seems like God would have intervened long before now.  Patience is a virtue, but if God was going to save us, surely it wouldn’t take him more than 200 years.

In the past it would have been political suicide for any politician to express a desire to limit or reduce Medicare, and/or social security, and/or to increase taxes.  People with the money are the ones funding the political campaigns, so who would win an election by advocating an increase in taxes?  People supported by social security and Medicare represent a substantial voting block.  If those senior citizens are not going to live to realize the consequences of the financial catastrophe we will face if the debt is not addressed, why would they vote to elect a candidate who would negatively impact the limited life they have left?

Because Sarah Palin is no longer a politician, and because she doesn’t articulate a specific plan for implementing any policies she promotes, the only yard stick available is her record as an elected official.  As mayor of Wasilla, Sarah Palin inherited a town with NO debt and left the town in debt in excess of $22,000,000. Certainly that would not be consistent with my definition of a fiscal conservative.  When Palin resigned as Governor, Alaska was the state with a 70% debt to GDP ratio, which was the highest state debt burden in the country.  Palin advertised herself as a politician opposed to earmarks.  The reality is that before she resigned as Governor, she requested $198 million in earmarks for Alaska.  While mayor of Wasilla, a town of 6,715 people, Palin hired a lobbyist, which led to the tiny town of Wasilla receiving almost $27,000,000 in federal tax dollars. Either Sarah Palin doesn’t understand what an earmark is or she’s lying.

This doesn’t sound like “common sense” to me; it sounds like a celebrity attempting to increase her personal wealth at the expense of America. If we are truly patriots, we must learn to recognize the motivations of people who are happy to take advantage of our fellow citizens.

Republicans, Democrats, and even Tea Baggers are all responsible for our national debt.  Republicans have been associated with increases in military spendingDemocrats have been associated with increases in entitlements. Even Tea Baggers have demonstrated their objection to governmental spending while advocating for more defense spending, and displaying signs suggesting that we should not touch their social security or Medicare.

The only commitment Sarah Palin seems to have is the commitment to increasing the balance in her personal bank account as fast as she can. Palin suggests that the current national budget is “immoral” and constitutes “generational theft”. The only thing truly “immoral” is lying to people about being opposed to earmarks, when you hired a lobbyist to obtain earmarks, and received over $26,000,000 of our federal tax dollars in earmarks.   The only “generational theft” that I have seen is the use of Palin’s own PAC funds, which were donated by retired people, that Palin ultimately used for her personal benefit.

Most politicians are quick to say that the debt is “unsustainable.”   Yet who have you seen that is willing to run on a platform of raising taxes, reducing entitlements, or reducing military spending?  Sarah Palin is the worst offender.  She intentionally misleads and/or lies. She chose to remove herself from a political position where she might actually have had a chance to facilitate change.  She is quick to criticize those with more education and experience than she, suggesting that they must not be praying hard enough to be worthy of divine intervention. Thus to criticize Sarah Palin is perceived by some as criticizing God.  The only divine intervention for which I pray for is the recognition of the hypocrisy of Sarah Palin.  The United States desperately needs solutions, and politicians willing to do that which is necessary to facilitate them.  Sarah Palin is no longer a politician.  She is a wealthy celebrity.  If Lady Gaga were to become an advocate for a political ideology, her celebrity status would suffer.  Lady Gaga has the common sense to limit her performances to singing.  Unfortunately Sarah Palin lacks common sense, though she does have a lot of personal cents.

A lot.  For over one year I have been researching, reading, and writing about the multitude of things that have led me to believe that Sarah Palin is unfit to serve in any capacity, at any level of government.  The list of her failings is long and impressive.  When someone asks me why I dislike Palin I have to pause and catch my breath.  It is hard to know where to begin.  Her attitude regarding homosexuality, banning books, reproductive freedom, race, equal pay for women, unethical behavior, charges to her PAC, attitudes toward people who work for her, the number of days Piper misses school, her use of Trig as a prop, the hypocrisy inherent in virtually everything she says compared to what she does, resignation from her position as Governor, personal charges for travel expenses of her children passed on to the people of Alaska, shooting animals, endangering the environment, her lack of understanding of countries around the world and basic geography, lack of education, blatant disregard for scientific evidence for evolution, lecturing at right to life rallies while hiring Lynn Vincent to be the ghost writer of her book knowing that Lynn admitted to having had an abortion, indicating that Bristol and Levi were going to marry and that would solve the problem of an unwed teenage pregnancy, mocking our President for having an understanding of the US Constitution, writing letters to herself in God’s voice  and her attitudes regarding responsibility as a mother are just a few of the many things with which I take issue.  However people might try to explain away my total lack of respect for Palin, suggesting that we simply have different world views.  People might suggest that just because I disagree with her politics, that they still don’t understand my ongoing efforts to discredit her.    On most of the issues mentioned, I recognize that there are a multitude of politicians who hold beliefs similar to Palin’s, so why would I object to Sarah Palin to the point of writing an entire book, writing daily entries on this blog, and submitting articles to Huffington Post for the entire nation to read?  Palin has done so many objectionable things over the last year-and-a-half that we tend to forget the egregious things she did before the day she was introduced at the Republican Convention.  In case anyone has forgotten, let me remind you of the two things that got me started:  the hockey center and the Road to Nowhere.

While mayor of Wasilla, Palin authorized the construction of a hockey center on property she KNEW was not owned by the town of Wasilla (Litman 23).  We might speculate about the house she was building at the same time, and whether the same contractor who was building the hockey center, and her home, might be giving her some personal reward for awarding the multi-million dollar contract on the hockey center to his company.  I don’t know why Palin wanted to build the center on that particular property owned by someone else, and I don’t care. However, it matters to me that she instituted an adverse possession lawsuit against the land owner in an attempt to take his property.  It does matter to me that she proceeded with construction of the hockey center before the city obtained title to the land.  It does matter to me that because she proceeded to initiate construction before the town had title to the land, the town incurred over $1,000,000 in unnecessary expenses (23).  It matters to me that the judge in the case found that Sarah had no right to begin construction of a building on property that she knew was not owned by the town.  Her judgment, or lack thereof, in this example demonstrates a total lack of responsibility to the people of the town, and a total disregard to the rights of the property owner.

This is not about politics.  It’s about judgment and about respecting the rights of an individual citizen.  There is surely nothing more objectionable than a politician attempting to confiscate that which you own, without any legal basis for doing so, but only because that politician wants something you have.  This is not an example of something Palin did due to ignorance or lack of education.  This was a fundamental error in judgment, or worse, an attitude that she could do whatever she wanted regardless of the rights of another person.

The second example is the Road to Nowhere.  Palin made the Bridge to Nowhere a household word as a result of her speech at the Republican Convention.  Many of us would tell you the bridge represented a waste of tax payer dollars.  There was a lot of controversy about whether Palin changed her position regarding the bridge, when it was convenient for her politically (she announced that she said “Thanks, but no thanks”, when she had originally been an advocate for the bridge, and has even been seen showing off her t-shirt supporting the bridge).  However there is no dispute that the Road to Nowhere had absolutely no purpose, other than to waste taxpayer dollars.  When Congress originally approved the funding for the construction of the bridge, there was also an allocation of $25,000,000 for the construction of the road leading from the airport to the bridge.  When Congress withdrew the funding for the bridge, the funding for the road was overlooked.  Sarah Palin indicated that “yes” she was still in favor of the construction of the road which she knew would now lead to the edge of a cliff.  According to the Alaska Transportation Priorities Project, a group promoting “sensible transportation systems in the state”, the Road to Nowhere was an “irresponsible waste”. Thus regardless of any philosophical differences you might have with a person on the right, or the left, we all agree that Palin knowingly wasted our money.  She knowingly wasted millions of dollars!  The only explanation for this waste is a “we versus them” mentality.  If the people of Alaska would benefit from the jobs created by the construction of the road, then it didn’t seem to matter to Governor Palin that the use of millions of federal tax dollars was an indisputable waste.

These two examples highlight an attitude of Sarah Palin that is deplorable.  These do not represent a political philosophy unless it is a philosophy of, “…if it is good for me, it doesn’t matter if it is a total waste of tax payer dollars, and it doesn’t matter if it interferes with the constitutional rights of another citizen.”   We may suspect that many politicians have a similar attitude, but it is difficult to prove it.  In the case of Sarah Palin, the facts are clear.  Her attitude seems to be that she will do what is good for her, and “to hell with the rest of us”.

Two days ago, I posted a blog expressing my outrage at a recent poll reported by Newsmax, identifying Palin as “now leading the GOP field as the party’s preferred candidate for president”.  (See,, Money Corrupts Newsmax and Palin.)  Today we have proof that Newsmax mislead us.  Politics Daily reported on March 29th that “…the overall public sees her negatively, by a 55% to 37% margin”, based upon a Washington Post poll. -tea-party-but-gets-high-negatives-from-general-public. Seven percent of the people polled were undecided.  The really frightening thing is that 37% of people still think she is the “preferred” candidate, or that 7% of people are still “undecided”.  I disagree with many politicians on a variety of issues.  Yet I haven’t written an entire book about them.  Even though many people in the country are more conservative than I, they don’t inspire me to devote hours each day writing a blog about them.

What scares me about Sarah Palin?

      1. It’s not just that she lacks intelligence, but what scares me is that she doesn’t know how limited she is.  She didn’t blink when John McCain asked her to be his running mate.
      2. It’s not just that she hunts and takes pleasure from killing animals, but what scares me is that she doesn’t seem to feel any remorse about inspiring violent behavior in people.
      3. It’s not just that she believes that abortion is wrong; it’s that she feels it is her place to impose her will on other women.
      4. It’s not that she objects to homosexuality, but that she feels it is appropriate to ban books from the Wasilla library regarding homosexuality.
      5. It’s not that she is a Caucasian; it’s that she seems to lack respect or appreciation for cultures other than her own.
      6. It’s not that she is an Evangelical Christian; it’s that she thinks the answer to our country’s problems is to seek divine intervention.
      7. It’s not that her pastor hunted witches in Africa, but it’s that Sarah didn’t find anything objectionable about it.
      8. It’s not that she is a woman, but it’s that she believes that women should defer to men in decision making.
      9. It’s not that she says she is in favor of cutting taxes, but it’s that she raised taxes while the mayor of Wasilla.
      10. It’s not that she says she is opposed to earmarks, but that she hired a lobbyist for the purpose of obtaining earmarks for Wasilla.
      11. It’s not that she changed her position on the Bridge to Nowhere, but that she wouldn’t admit that she did.
      12. It’s not that she doesn’t have a law degree, it’s that she lacks the common sense required to prevent her from spending millions of dollars building a hockey center on property the city didn’t own.
      13. It’s not that she has five children, but that she uses her children to gain political advantage.
      14. It’s not that she gives speeches around the country to right-to-life rallies, making hundreds of thousands dollars; it’s that she hired a woman to be the ghost-writer of her book who publically admits that she has had an abortion.
      15. It’s not just that she was found by an Alaskan investigative panel to have behaved unethically, it’s that she told the public she had been completely exonerated.
      16. It’s not just that she uses Trig to advertise herself as a proponent of kids with special needs, it’s that she endangered him by boarding a flight from Texas to Alaska, after her water had broken, after she knew she was in labor, and when she knew it was her fifth pregnancy.
      17. It’s not just that she advocates “abstinence”  teaching, it’s that she was pregnant when she married, and that Bristol has had a child out of wedlock after Bristol and Levi were living in Sarah’s house when she “probably knew” they were having sex.
      18. It’s not that she resigned her position as Governor of Alaska to make money, it’s that in the same speech announcing her resignation she had the temerity to say that she is not a “quitter”.
      19. It’s not that John McCain wouldn’t endorse Palin after the election; it’s that Palin doesn’t seem to mind that McCain is using her again to endorse him for Arizona Senator.
      20. It’s not that she advocates “common sense conservative values”; it’s that she doesn’t seem to know what policies that would include.
      21. It’s not that she is a wolf, but that she wears the clothes of a sheep.

Regardless of your political persuasions, we should all be aware of the inherent dangers of Sarah Palin.  A person, who pronounces nuclear as “nucular”, should never be trusted with the codes.  A person who thinks Africa is a country should not be entrusted with the security of our nation.  This is not about politics.  It is about competency, intelligence, deceit, and honor.

“Rebuttal to the Rogue”, is available on  I have no ulterior motive in promoting the book as all proceeds are being donated to Planned Parenthood.  This is a book that documents why Palin is so dangerous to the country, and specifically to women.  How could I complain about Sarah Palin, if I weren’t willing to spend the time to document why Sarah Palin is so frightening to me?  We must all work together to ensure that people know who Palin is, and what she actually DOES, instead of what she SAYS!  Especially our Republican friends need to know who the real Palin is.  We must make sure that we never come so close to a national disaster as we did in 2008.  Please help me get the word out!  Tell your friends about this book, this blog, or just why they should expect more out of a Republican candidate.   I respect another person who may have an opinion different than my own.  If we have fundamental differences of opinion about how to govern, I will respect the opposition…as long as it is not Sarah Palin.    Please help educate the 37% of people who think she is “neat” and the 7% of people who are “undecided” that this country can not afford to have Sarah Palin as our leader.  We have only 1 ½ years to educate people, so we better start today.   Sarah is not blinking.  We must. If you are reading this blog, you understand the urgency.  If you have any ideas about how to defeat her nomination, please post them.

If you need a link to show your friends who may not have the time or inclination to read “Rebuttal to the Rogue”, just send them to:

If you are as tired as I am of Sarah Palin, and you just need something to make you smile, see Tina Fey on Letterman at:

See Letterman’s Recap of Palin:

See Matt Damon on Sarah Palin:

Dear Sarah,

I know you have recently been campaigning for John McCain in Arizona in his race for re-election to the Senate.  Of course you feel a debt of gratitude. Your nomination by John, as hurried as it may have been, catapulted you into the national scene, making millions of dollars for you and your family members.  How lucky for you that a girl from Wasilla, Alaska with a very limited education and history in public service could be chosen for one of the highest offices in the country.  How lucky for you that you won the Miss Wasilla Beauty Pageant, so you were well qualified in the eyes of John McCain.  I know you hadn’t gotten to travel much outside of Alaska before your nomination.  Now, thanks to John McCain, you have gotten to travel all over the country by private plane.  I know before the election that no one cared about baby pictures of your grandchild, but now magazines will pay hundreds of thousands of dollars for the pictures.  I know before this election you didn’t have a lot of friends, but now you have over a million on Face Book!  Way to go Sarah.

The Arizona Senate race won’t actually occur until November of 2010.  John will be having a birthday before then, and I wanted to give you plenty of time to make all the arrangements for an appropriate party.  On Aug 29th John will turn 74 years old.  Wow!  John is amazing!  If he makes it to his birthday, he will have outlived his own life-expectancy.  Most men in the United States are lucky to live to the age of 74( but John isn’t letting that minor detail deter his race for yet another term.  Maybe it’s a good thing that he doesn’t use a computer so he doesn’t know what his life expectancy is.  If he is elected in November, and if he lives out his full term of six years, he would then be 80 years old! He is a high achiever for sure!

Precautions you might want to consider for his party:

  1. Have am EMT standing by just in case there is a medical emergency.  During the election there was an issue about whether he was a potential candidate for a stroke. (See, McCain gets lost on stage 9zA0x5Sg&annotation_id=annotation_576692&feature=iv;

See also,

McCain’s Left Eye Droops (Video) | Bitten and Bound

Sep 25, 2008 )  It’s his left eye that seems to give him problems so take the birthday photos from his right side.

2.  Let Cindy buy the gifts as she still has more money than you.

3.  Don’t invite Lilly Ledbetter to the party as John didn’t vote for fair pay for her and I think Lilly is still a little miffed about that.  She also would have a hard time affording a gift since she was underpaid for most of her career.

4.  Don’t invite Justice Sonia Sotomayor.  I know  John thought :

“There is no doubt that Judge Sotomayor has the professional background and qualifications that one hopes for in a Supreme Court nominee.  She is a former prosecutor, served as an attorney in private practice and spent twelve years as an appellate court judge.  She is an immensely qualified candidate.”  See,

but he still voted against her confirmation.

5.  Tell Cindy and Meghan to take the duct tape off their mouths so they can sing happy birthday….remember the duct tape they put over their mouths when they were protesting the don’t ask-don’t tell policy.

6.  Don’t let John tell any jokes at the party as some of the women attending the party might not think his jokes about rape are very funny.

7.  If a lot of John’s friends can’t make it, maybe you could get some of the older people from the local nursing home to come…you know the ones in the wheelchair and using the walker who served as the witnesses for your wedding.  Oh yeah, they probably are no longer around, so maybe you could take some of your kids since their school seems to allow them to miss school any time you wish.

Good Luck and have a great party!   Malia

Having just returned with my family from Spain and Portugal on Spring Break, I am once again reminded of the diversity of the people that inhabit our world.  We encountered people from countries around the world, and languages that I couldn’t even identify.  Clothing, shoes, hairstyles, cars driven and foods were just some of the many obvious differences.  We didn’t have time to begin to understand the many cultures of the peoples we encountered, as we were traveling from place to place so quickly.

During the campaign of 2008, a fair amount of press was devoted to the fact that Sarah Palin had not traveled outside the United States, except with a very few limited exceptions.  Palin would tell us that only the “elite” could afford to travel outside the United States, and thus we should not be critical of her for not having a need to even obtain a passport until recently.

Unfortunately it is the JOB of the President of the United States to represent our country in global affairs.  If our President has not traveled outside the United States, and is not familiar with cultures around the globe, how would that person be knowledgeable enough to adequately represent our country in world affairs?   It is not an issue of elitism; it is an issue of knowledge, education, and experience.  Why wouldn’t we want, and demand, a President that is worldly?

I was not able to afford to travel outside the continental United States until graduating from law school, so I wore blinders for many years.  As soon as I was able to see more of the world, I did.  I discarded my blinders, and refuse to wear them again.  Unfortunately, Sarah Palin never seemed to see a need to shed hers.  I though I have experienced cultures from many countries around the world, I don’t feel adequately equipped to serve as President of the United States.

On the plane home from Madrid, the front page story from the newspaper printed in Spain was an article regarding the health care reform Obama has been working to enact, and a picture of our President that occupied about 1/3 of the front page.  Issues in the United States are of interest and concern globally.  It is essential that our President be respected globally.  Obama is.  Palin isn’t even respected by the majority of people in our own country.  Certainly in Alaska, the state where they know her best, they respect her least.

There is a difference between not being educated, knowledgeable, or informed about different races, religions, and cultures and being a bigot.  One implies a lack of information, the other implies an attitude that we should not tolerate in our elected officials, our politicians, or even among our celebrities.  One implies ignorance.  The other implies a morally reprehensible attitude.  At a minimum, we can conclude that Palin is ignorant of cultures different than those found in Wasilla, Alaska.  However we must ask the next question.  Is she also guilty of a morally reprehensible attitude toward other cultures?

Blogs have reported a comment that was attributed to Palin, that was overheard by a waitress by the name of Lucille, in Alaska.  The statement attributed to Palin was that “Sambo beat the bitch”.  I chose not to report this comment in “Rebuttal to the Rogue”, as it was not confirmed by any source that I could verify.  I was able to verify that Palin had attended college in Hawaii, and left shortly after she arrived.  From the book “Trailblazer”, I had the impression that she had chosen that college because of the weather and the fact that her friends all gained admission.  Whether it was because of smoking too much pot, having too much fun with her friends, or being tired of the rain in Hawaii, it never occurred to me that she might have left because she was put off by the variety of Asian people she encountered in Hawaii.

Since the publication of “Rebuttal to the Rogue”, Sarah’s father has reported that Sarah was put off by the number of Asian people she encountered in Hawaii.  I assume  Palin’s father has nothing to gain from reporting a falsehood.   Thus it would appear that Palin is less than tolerant of anyone who looks different than she, or anyone who has values different than her own.

Part of what makes the United States of America great is respect and equal treatment of all people regardless of their race, religion, or sexual preferences.  Palin is no longer a politician, but she is a celebrity.  I expect better even among celebrities.  We should vocalize our outrage at this type of attitude.

I respect your right to have different attitudes than mine.  I even respect Sarah’s right to have attitudes that are different than mine.  I do not respect anyone’s attempt to infringe upon the rights guaranteed by our Constitution.  Even if you are no longer a politician, and just a celebrity on Fox News, we demand that you treat people with respect and refrain from imposing your attitudes on others.  To suggest that such a person should write a book about virtues is ludicrous. Harper-Collins should be ashamed of publishing a book suggesting that Sarah Palin knows anything about virtues.  Does a bigot know anything about virtues?

Evolution of the Feminine Mystique

Just Say NO to BS

The Ignorance of Sarah Palin

Rebuttal to the Rogue


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,965 other followers

Share This Blog


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,965 other followers